U.S. Supreme Court Cases

Petrella v. MGM

The United States Supreme Court case of Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), No. 12-1315, addressed the issue of laches in a copyright case.

At issue was the question as to whether Paula Petrella, daughter of Frank Petrella, waited too long in bringing her copyright infringement suit against MGM for the original 1963 script authored by Mr. Petrella on the life of boxing legend Jake LaMotta. The 1963 script was the basis for the Academy Award nominated movie “Raging Bull,” starring Robert DeNiro and Joe Pesci.

The Federal District Court ruled against Ms. Petrella, as did the three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit, ruling that Ninth Circuit precedent dictated that Ms. Petrella’s delay in filing suit was an absolute bar to her claims for copyright infringement under the doctrine of laches.

Steven W. Smyrski was Counsel of Record representing the California Society of Entertainment Lawyers (CSEL) in the two Amicus Briefs filed in support of Petitioner Petrella, one in support of her Petition for Certiorari and another in support of her Supreme Court case against MGM.

CSEL “is a non-profit, non-partisan, professional organization of attorneys representing authors, screenwriters, song-writers, and other creators of intellectual property in the entertainment industry, including television, film, and music.”

CSEL’s brief in support of Ms. Petrella’s Petition for Certiorari, with Mr. Smyrski acting as Counsel of Record, can be found at:

http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/CSEL-cert-amicus-brief.pdf

CSEL argued that the Ninth Circuit has for decades been highly adverse to copyright plaintiffs, typically artists and creators represented by attorneys in the Society. Mr. Smyrski, together with Steven Lowe and Daniel Lifschitz of CSEL, prepared and filed the sole Amicus brief in support of Ms. Petrella in her Petition for Certiorari. Thus the Supreme Court considered Ms. Petrella’s brief, as Petitioner, and the CSEL brief. MGM opposed the Petition.  Mr. Smyrski and CSEL are mentioned in the following Variety article:

http://variety.com/2013/biz/news/supreme-courts-raging-bull-case-highlights-9th-circuit-favoritism-to-hollywood-studios-attorneys-say-1200686168/

Odds of success of a Petition for Certiorari before the United States Supreme Court are approximately one percent, or 1 in 100.

On October 1, 2013, the Supreme Court GRANTED Ms. Petrella’s Petition for Certiorari.

Mr. Smyrski again represented CSEL in its Amicus Brief on behalf of Ms. Petrella in her Supreme Court case. Mr. Smyrski, acting as Counsel of Record, argued on behalf of CSEL that perceived problems if the Ninth Circuit laches standard were overblown, and that it was unlikely that plaintiffs would “flood” the courts with copyright litigation if the Ninth Circuit standard was overturned.

The CSEL brief in support of Ms. Petrella’s case, the second Amicus Brief, is available  at:

http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v3/12-1315_pet_amcu_csel.authcheckdam.pdf

The CSEL brief was one of four Amicus Briefs filed in support of Ms. Petrella in her Supreme Court case.

The U.S. Supreme Court case of Petrella v. MGM was argued on January 21, 2014. Professor Stephanos Bibas of the University of Pennsylvania argued on behalf of Ms. Petrella. Mr. Smyrski personally attended the Supreme Court hearing.

On May 19, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Petrella v. MGM, ruling in favor of Petitioner Petrella. The majority opinion, written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, reflected a 6-3 vote in favor of Petitioner Petrella.

The Supreme Court opinion may be found at:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-1315_ook3.pdf

“It is a great honor to have worked on this case. I have been a lawyer for over 20 years and this was a unique experience to argue in support of a litigant whose case is granted certiorari and favorably decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.  I am extremely happy for Ms. Petrella, and appreciate the opportunity to represent CSEL in this landmark case” said Mr. Smyrski.

Kirby v. Marvel Properties

Mr. Smyrski also represented Mark Evanier, Tom Morrow, and PEN Center USA as Counsel of Record in their Amicus Brief in their Petition for Certiorari in the case of Kirby v. Marvel Properties, Case No. 13-1178.  The Amicus Brief detailed the state of business activities in the comic book industry during the period when Jack Kirby created or co-created numerous memorable superhero comic book characters, including Captain America, The Fantastic Four, The Mighty Thor, The Incredible Hulk, The Avengers, X-Men, and Spider-Man.

The Evanier/Morrow/PEN Amicus Brief is available at:

http://www.ami.org/images/stories/downloads/Kirby%20v.%20Marvel%20-%20Evanier%20Amicus%20Brief%20-%206.13.2014.pdf 

The Kirby estate’s claims for damages had been completely rejected by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but based on the Kirby Petition for Certiorari and the Amicus Briefs filed in support, Marvel decided to settle the case with the Kirby estate on terms acceptable to the Kirby family.

The Kirby case, the Amicus Brief, and Mr. Smyrski are discussed in a number of instances, including:

Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirbys-heirs-get-huge-712924

Comic Book Resources, discussing the Hollywood Reporter article: http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2014/06/will-supreme-court-weigh-in-on-kirby-heirs-fight-with-marvel/

This Is Infamous, also discussing the Hollywood Reporter article: http://thisisinfamous.com/jack-kirbys-heirs-get-support-push-towards-supreme-court-review/

Billboard, citing the Hollywood Reporter article and the possible application to the music industry: http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/legal-and-management/6128502/jack-kirby-lawsuit-marvel-x-men-termination

Comicus, Italian website discussing the case: http://www.comicus.it/index.php/mainmenu-news/item/57396-marvelkirby/57396-marvelkirby

Recommendations

Lenny Lipton, Inventor

Steve combines a rare gift for digging out the essence of an invention with a determined methodology for working with the patent office. I’ve worked with other patent attorneys in the past and Steve makes a grueling process easier. He is also cost-conscious and has worked with me to find the least expensive ways to get good results. He is a great guide to help with navigating the complexities of a daunting process.

Joey Liu, Partner at One LLP

Steve Smyrski is an excellent patent attorney and one of the most personable people I know in this field. He was a great help to me on patent prosecution matters when I was in-house counsel at Advanced Medical Optics. Steve’s litigation background and experience are invaluable when he prepares and prosecutes patent applications, and provides counsel on patent matters, and the results were excellent.  I recommend Steve highly to anyone in need of a patent counsel as his services are truly value added.

Mark McMillan, Vice President Worldwide Sales at Sonics, Inc.

Steve is an excellent technology lawyer, and I recommend his work highly. I would endorse Steve and his firm as an excellent choice for anyone or any company seeking high quality, cost effective patent procurement, opinion, and patent licensing services. Steve is a skilled IP lawyer with exemplary talent in negotiating licenses and pursuing patent protection for complex high technology designs. Steve navigates well through difficult issues, works well with all members of the corporation from the boardroom to the lab, and is very personable and accessible. I highly recommend Steve and his firm.

Stephen Fairley, Law Firm Marketing Expert, Legal Marketing, Business Coach, Best-selling Author, Marketing Expert for Lawyers LLP

Steven is an experienced attorney with years of practice in intellectual property.

 If you’re a small business owner or inventor looking to not only protect your IP, but also maximize the revenues from it, I strongly encourage you to connect with Steven.

 Also, check out his website at: www.smyrski.com

 Marius Domokos, Post-Semiconductor Startup Recovery Stage

Steve provided patent portfolio counseling and development as an outside counsel for KLA-Tencor. Steve is an exceptional patent attorney, with an oustanding ability to map patent claims to product revenue and business operations, across a broad range of technologies. Additionally, Steve was always very pleasant to work with and very responsive to all client needs.

Andrew Grossman, Partner at WilmerHale

Steve is an excellent attorney with top notch legal and technical skills. He is extremely responsive, making him a pleasure to work with, and always provides practical and effective legal advice.

Anthony Miele, IP Lawyer and Litigator, Cooley Manion Jones, LLP

I have had the opportunity to work with Steve in a large matter involving patent litigation in the context of a critical corporate deal for one of our clients. Steve’s diligence and his “bedside manner” were key to our success.

Joel B. German, Vice President, Assistant General Counsel, Allergan

Steven is one of the best in his field: his work is careful, insightful, and of consistently high quality. I learned much from working with him, and would recommend him without hesitation.

Charan Brahma, Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, LLP

I have known Steve both during his time at Pillsbury and subsequently in the context of his private practice. Steve is a talented, outside-the-box thinker who combined in-depth scientific knowledge with seasoned legal thinking. He objectively weighs both legal and business interests when advising his clients, working efficiently and effectively to achieve his clients’ goals.

Bruce Baldwin, Law Practice Professional

I had the good fortune to work with Steve at Pillsbury. Steve was, and is, a model attorney; diligent, sensitive to client issues, and extraordinarily intelligent. I recommend Steve without reservation to anyone in need of his services; you don’t get better attorneys than Steve.

Firm Personnel

Steven W. Smyrski, Esq.

Mr. Smyrski has over twenty five years of experience in all phases of intellectual property, including patent prosecution and litigation, technology license drafting and negotiation, enforcement and infringement avoidance strategies, patent portfolio evaluations, infringement/validity analyses, and design around of U.S. patents.  Mr. Smyrski has personally drafted over 350 original U.S. patent applications in such diverse fields as telecommunications hardware and software, semiconductor design, fabrication, and inspection, medical devices, signal processing components, computer hardware and software, neural networks, and business methods.

Mr. Smyrski has also litigated a variety of intellectual property disputes, including asserting and defending over ten patents for a large telecommunications manufacturer, litigating patents covering graphics accelerator chips, pursuing patent, antitrust, and state law claims against a racing car clutch manufacturer, and petitioning for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court.  Mr. Smyrski acted as lead outside intellectual property counsel in the $950 million acquisition of the printing division of a computer printer manufacturer, assessing the scope of the target’s intellectual property portfolio and negotiating licensing terms, and has rendered opinions regarding the scope of certain patents, and has acted as counsel to parties engaged in patent interferences and reexaminations.  Mr. Smyrski annually presides as a Moot Court judge in the annual Pepperdine Intellectual Property Moot Court competition.

Mr. Smyrski’s practice is directed to assisting clients in strengthening their patent positions in the marketplace through obtaining patent protection across various technologies, using an extensive knowledge of licensing and litigation strategies and tactics.  His practice includes developing patent portfolios by preparing and filing patent applications, performing due diligence investigations of intellectual property matters, and reviewing products and processes to assess infringement risks.  Mr. Smyrski’s practice also includes copyright and trademark counseling and prosecution services, primarily in the high technology industry.

Prior to founding Smyrski Law Group, A P.C., previously Smyrski & Livesay, LLP, Mr. Smyrski served as Senior Counsel for the Intellectual Property Group of Pillsbury Winthrop, an international general practice firm.  Mr. Smyrski began his legal career as an associate at Poms, Smith, Lande & Rose, a patent and intellectual property firm in Los Angeles.  Prior to law school, Mr. Smyrski was an engineer for over eight years for two Southern California defense contractors, Hughes Aircraft Company and Northrop Corporation.

EDUCATION

Purdue University (Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, 1982);
University of Southern California (Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, 1986);
Southwestern University School of Law (Juris Doctor, 1992).

MEMBERSHIPS

State Bar of California (bar #162617);
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (registration #38,312)

Registered to practice before:
United States Supreme Court;
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals;
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals;
U.S. District Court, Central District of California;
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of California

Contact

Smyrski Law Group, A P.C.
3310 Airport Avenue, SW
Santa Monica, California  90405

inquiries@smyrski.com

Phone:  77 55 PATENT (775.572.8368)
Fax:  310.397.9158

Smyrski Law Group, A P.C

 

Law . Technology . Patents